Writes Andrew Sullivan, expressing my thoughts exactly. I keep reading the news stories and intending to blog, but each time I end up searching in vain for the facts I need to understand it enough to begin to write about it. The reporting on this story is atrocious. It's all updates with no background. So, I'm wondering not only what happened in Jena, but why is the press reporting it this way?
Sullivan links to Megan McArdle's summary of the Wikipedia article on the subject, which she understands is "pretty authoritative." It's pathetic that we're reduced to going to Wikipedia because the mainstream news of a current event is too skimpy.
Saturday, September 22, 2007
"What The Hell Happened in Jena? I haven't commented because, frankly, I am still unsure of all the details of the case..."
Labels:
crime,
journalism,
racial politics,
Wikipedia
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment