"In fact, it's the opposite of what it's trying to be. People don't have trouble understanding why Marbles would want to do this because pie-throwing is too surreal or subversive for our comprehension; we have trouble seeing the point because pie-throwing is trite, formulaic, old-fashioned, humanizing toward the target, and ultimately meaningless."
Writes John Cohen (my son), building on T.A. Frank's New Republic piece "Is Pie-Throwing Ever Morally Justifiable?"
(I have avoided mentioning the Murdoch pie-throwing incident until now because I despise the usual portrayals of pie-throwing.)
Showing posts with label Rupert Murdoch. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rupert Murdoch. Show all posts
Saturday, July 23, 2011
Tuesday, July 19, 2011
The NYT live-blogs British parliamentary hearings.
The phone-hacking scandal is important to the United States, because....
Labels:
privacy,
Rupert Murdoch,
UK
Sunday, July 17, 2011
"Rebekah Brooks has been arrested..."
"... by police investigating allegations of phone hacking by the News of the World and allegations that police officers were bribed to leak sensitive information."
... Brooks, 43, resigned on Friday as News International's chief executive. She is a former News of the World editor and was close to Rupert Murdoch and the prime minister, David Cameron.
Labels:
crime,
David Cameron,
journalism,
Rupert Murdoch,
surveillance,
UK
Saturday, July 16, 2011
"I test limits by publishing controversial material and paying people who are willing to step forward and expose political hypocrisy."
Larry Flynt says in a WaPo op-ed:
Murdoch’s minions, on the other hand, pushed limits by allegedly engaging in unethical or criminal activity: phone hacking, bribery, coercing criminal behavior and betraying the trust of their readership. If News Corp.’s reported wrongdoings are true, what Murdoch’s company has been up to does not just brush against boundaries — it blows right past them.
One cannot live off the liberty and benefits of a free press while ignoring the privacy of the people.
Labels:
crime,
free speech,
Larry Flynt,
law,
privacy,
Rupert Murdoch
Wednesday, July 13, 2011
"While one must always be cautious in seeking government investigation of the media for the obvious First Amendment concerns..."
"... this is not actually an investigation of the media, but an investigation of criminal acts undertaken by those masquerading as members of the media."
Eliot Spitzer, writing in Slate, thinks the Murdoch scandal (although it's occurring in the UK) is "an opportunity for the Justice Department to show it can flex its muscles at the right moment."
Eliot Spitzer, writing in Slate, thinks the Murdoch scandal (although it's occurring in the UK) is "an opportunity for the Justice Department to show it can flex its muscles at the right moment."
Labels:
Eric Holder,
law,
Rupert Murdoch,
Spitzer,
UK
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)