Wow. I'm just seeing this now. How awkward. I was embarrassed to watch the clip. Jack Nicholson — the greatest actor of the modern era (or something) — comes out as if he's going to announce the award, observes that it's traditionally one presenter who does the announcement, then throws it to a White House feed where it's Michelle Obama, dressed up in her ball gown, in the company of White House toadies in tuxes. And then "Lincoln" doesn't even win, so we don't get the stunning climax of all of history that was what the producers may have thought they were setting up.
Abysmal.
IN THE COMMENTS: Drago said: "Those aren't 'toadies.' Those are the military aides assigned to the President. They have no choice but to be there when 'directed.' And those aren't 'tuxes,' those are military dress uniforms." I stand corrected. I'm sorry. I was going to watch the video again to check that detail but there was no scroll bar on the video and I could not put up with watching it in real time. Why were military personnel used as props for an entertainment industry awards show?
Showing posts with label I was wrong. Show all posts
Showing posts with label I was wrong. Show all posts
Monday, February 25, 2013
Sunday, January 13, 2013
I just noticed I have a tag "I was wrong."
I've only used it once.
I'll use it again for this post, and if you click on it, you see that I only once commemorated my wrongness with the official "I was wrong" tag.
I'll use it again for this post, and if you click on it, you see that I only once commemorated my wrongness with the official "I was wrong" tag.
Labels:
I was wrong
Friday, January 2, 2009
"Lots of folks are wearing those 2009 glasses, and I suddenly realize that this is the last year for the 00 glasses."
"You'll have to wait until the year 3000 to wear glasses like that. Will we even have eyes in 3000?"
I wrote that at 10:08 in the New Year's Eve live-blog.
In the comments, just an hour ago, Peter Hoh wrote: "Someone else noticed the 200X glasses issue." He links here. Ha ha.
That reminds me, Chris explained why I was wrong. Let me illustrate:
I wrote that at 10:08 in the New Year's Eve live-blog.
In the comments, just an hour ago, Peter Hoh wrote: "Someone else noticed the 200X glasses issue." He links here. Ha ha.
That reminds me, Chris explained why I was wrong. Let me illustrate:
Labels:
cartoons,
Chris,
drawing,
evolution,
eyeglasses,
I was wrong,
Peter Hoh
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)