The NY Post displays Larry Greenfield's pathetic tale of woe:“I thought he was attractive enough, nice enough. I don’t see why all of these things haven’t worked out,” [said one of the women he deemed inadequate]. “He’s looking for love at first sight, and everyone has imperfections. Talk to someone. Get to know them.
“To find a woman who wants to stay at home and lives in Manhattan, he might be looking in the wrong time period,” Gordon said....
Long Island matchmaker Maureen Tara Nelson — who Greenfield has said failed him — fired back yesterday that one woman she set him up with, and whom he dismissed as “terrible” looking, was too good for him.
“He thinks since he has money that he is entitled to a beautiful woman,” she said.
“He needs to realize beautiful women are beyond his reach.”
And now the Post is acting, essentially, as his new matchmaker,
feeding him this self-described "beautiful" woman:
Greenfield has already given the thumbs up on [Kimberly] Brody’s looks and pedigree — though he said she’s at the edge of his age limit.
It doesn’t matter that he’s 47 — and has never had a girlfriend for more than three months.
And that was 12 years ago.
“The age is the thing that gets me,” said Greenfield, who wants a partner young enough to bear his children.
What are Brody's chances? Approximately zero. The man should only go out with women under 35. Either they are willing to go out with him or they are not. Why is he toying with these older ladies and why are they bothering with him? Oh, the answer is so obvious it's not worth the trouble of typing it out, and the Post is giving this man a platform... why? That's obvious too, but I'll bother to type that out: He's fun to kick around.
:.
0 comments:
Post a Comment