Laid him down to die. Ted Koppel's son.
Do you know when it's okay to let somebody sleep it off?
Tuesday, June 1, 2010
Remaining silent is not an invocation of the right to remain silent.
Says the Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision, Berghuis v. Thompkins.
''Thompkins did not say that he wanted to remain silent or that he did not want to talk to police,'' [wrote Justice Kennedy for the Court]. ''Had he made either of these simple, unambiguous statements, he would have invoked his 'right to cut off questioning.' Here he did neither, so he did not invoke his right to remain silent.''....ADDED: Pinkerton predicted it:
''Criminal suspects must now unambiguously invoke their right to remain silent -- which counterintuitively, requires them to speak,'' [wrote Justice Sotomayor for the dissenters]. ''At the same time, suspects will be legally presumed to have waived their rights even if they have given no clear expression of their intent to do so. Those results, in my view, find no basis in Miranda or our subsequent cases and are inconsistent with the fair-trial principles on which those precedents are grounded.''
Labels:
Anthony Kennedy,
crime,
law,
Pinkerton,
Sonia Sotomayor,
Supreme Court
Photographs by/of Dennis Hopper.
Hopper took some cool photographs in the 1960s — cool not just because he had access to some of the celebrities of that era (Paul Newman, Jane Fonda, Bill Cosby, Brian Jones, Tuesday Weld, Andy Warhol, etc.).
And Terry Richardson did a nice cigar-smoking sequence of Hopper.
Via Metafilter, which highlights the great photoblog Chasing Light.
And Terry Richardson did a nice cigar-smoking sequence of Hopper.
Via Metafilter, which highlights the great photoblog Chasing Light.
Labels:
Bill Cosby,
cigar,
Dennis Hopper,
Jane Fonda,
Metafilter,
Paul Newman,
photography,
Rolling Stones,
smoking,
Warhol
"[N]ot every closely divided opinion splits the Supreme Court along ideological lines."
Says Jonathan Adler:
In Carr v. United States, the Supreme Court held, 6–3, that the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), which requires convicted sex offenders to register with local authorities when they move from one state to another, does not apply to sex offenders whose interstate travel occurred before the Act went into effect. This holding enabled the Court to avoid consideration of whether SORNA’s registration requirement violates the ex post facto clause. Justice Sotomayor wrote the opinion for the Court, joined by the Chief Justice and Justices Stevens, Kennedy, and Breyer. Justice Scalia concurred in part and in the judgment. Justice Alito dissented, joined by Justices Thomas and Ginsburg.
Labels:
crime,
law,
Supreme Court
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)