He had better command of both the issues and the facts, offered plenty of corroborative studies and resources, and managed to make all of it accessible to the average voter. Cain did well at times, but twice had to ask Newt to handle questions first, which isn’t exactly a confidence builder. Cain seemed confused about the difference between defined-benefit and premium-support approaches on Medicare, getting confused between pension plans and health care later on the same point. While Cain discussed philosophical approaches to these issues confidently, Gingrich had actual data at the ready, and the difference was telling.
Sunday, November 6, 2011
"Who won the Cain-Gingrich debate?"
"It’s pretty clear that Gingrich had the better of this debate," says Ed Morrissey.
Labels:
Ed Morrissey,
Gingrich,
Herman Cain,
Medicare
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment