"And former Gov. Palin and the tea party movement are more the targets than the source.... [I]f you're using this event to criticize the 'rhetoric' of Mrs. Palin or others with whom you disagree, then you're either: (a) asserting a connection between the 'rhetoric' and the shooting, which based on evidence to date would be what we call a vicious lie; or (b) you're not, in which case you're just seizing on a tragedy to try to score unrelated political points, which is contemptible. Which is it?"
Glenn Reynolds in the Wall Street Journal.
ADDED: Remember when liberal NYT columnist Charles Blow said this about Sarah Palin: "She’s like the ominous blob in the horror films: the more you shoot at it, the bigger and stronger it becomes." AND: Why did I add that? Just as one example of what I think are many, many expressions of violence aimed at Sarah Palin. This attempt to connect Sarah Palin to the shooting is one of the most ridiculous and despicable political arguments I have ever seen.
Sunday, January 9, 2011
"There's a climate of hate out there, all right, but it doesn't derive from the innocuous use of political clichés."
Labels:
Charles Blow,
crime,
Gabrielle Giffords,
Instapundit,
rhetoric,
Sarah Palin,
tea parties
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment