"[The New York Times is] having a hell of a time monetizing [the web] because it is too vast, too borderless, too fluid to carve out property on it. It's like trying to make a profit in a communist state.... [Bloggers have] feel optimistic... because we've tried to take advantage of this new dimension, by being a totally open source portal, a hub, a node of conversation and argument. This brings in readers and advertizers. Are the advertizers enough to finance a news organization? Not yet, and maybe never.... The NYT may be smart in doing what it's doing... but it may lead to even greater traffic for blogs that can merely cite or summarize NYT pieces and have small excerpts as fair use as well..."
So writes Andrew Sullivan, who seems to be overcorrecting his tendency toward British spelling.
Thursday, January 21, 2010
"Sealing an online product off from the core online experience seems to me to be a medium at war with itself and a business not fully aware of the actual product it is creating."
Labels:
advertising,
Andrew Sullivan,
commerce,
copyright,
nyt,
spelling,
the web,
TimesSelect
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment